DSLR Pics: 1952 Chevy truck with the Canon EOS-1D Mark III

This photo was shot with the handy EF 24-105mm f/4L IS general purpose zoom lens mounted on the Canon EOS-1D Mark III.

It was shot in RAW and processed through Adobe Photoshop's RAW converter using the "B&W with red filter" setting.

Like I usually do, I have the 1D Mk3 set up to record both a RAW file and a high res monochrome JPEG. Even though I (almost) never use the straight-out-of-camera JPEG, this ensures that the image shown on the back of the camera is in monochrome and helps me keep my head in that B&W mode, looking for light, shadow, and texture rather than colors.

.

DSLR Pics: Holden with the Canon EOS-1D Mark IV

It was a gorgeous day on Sunday, sunny but cool, and I figured it would be a primo day to get some squirrel photos on the way to and from lunch.

So I grabbed the EOS-1D Mark IV and EF 70-200mm f/4L IS combo, which is pretty much my favorite squirrel-spotting rig. On the way out the door I noticed Holden lounging in his perch atop the cat tree in the living room, which puts him at roughly eye-level. The bright March sunlight filtering through the drapes made the shot irresistible, so I put the camera in Aperture priority mode, opened the lens wide, bumped the ISO to 3200 and (with help from Bobbi to get the lad to look around some) started snapping.

The bottom photo is processed from the RAW and the top is a SOOC monochrome JPEG. 

On the way to lunch I didn't see many squirrels. I guess when you're arboreal you don't venture out of your drey much when the branches are waving in a 10-15mph breeze.

I did, however, see this Eastern cottontail doe...

High ISO

Canon EOS-1D MkIII & 24-105mm f/4L IS, ISO 3200

While the Nikon D1X could go up to ISO 800 and the Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II went all the way to 1600, I was leery of using either one at more than ISO 400 for fear of unusable amounts of noise.

It wasn't until 2007, with the release of the Canon EOS-1D Mark III and the Nikon D3 that 1600 and 3200 became practical settings, at least in my opinion.

This seems impossibly quaint here in 2024, when I'm seeing friends posting images from Canon R6's and Nikon Z7 II's at five-digit ISOs with no really noticeable noise, but it was a big deal back then.

Nikon D3 & 24-120mm f/4G VR, ISO 1600

Canon EOS-1D Mk III: The Need for Speed

One of the problems with early DSLRs, especially when shooting in RAW, was the time it took to record image files to the storage device.

Back in 2001, the Nikon high-res D1X pro body would shoot at 3 frames per second, but it filled the buffer with only six RAW (or NEF, in Nikon-speak) frames. A couple years later, the consumer-grade Canon EOS Digital Rebel could nearly equal that frame rate at 2.5 FPS, although it filled its buffer in only four shots and then required a full "five Mississippi" count until the buffer was cleared.

The big revolutionary breakthrough was the Canon EOS-1D Mark III. Released in 2007, it came with a pair of Canon's DIGIC III image processing chips (as opposed to the lone chip found on lesser Canons) and these worked in parallel to allow not only a blistering 10 frames per second max speed, but it took a full thirty RAW files before the buffer finally tapped out and needed time to catch up. If you just wanted to shoot JPEGs, you could hold the shutter button down for a full eleven seconds before the buffer needed a breather. This was a 20% increase in frame rate and a 50% increase in buffer capacity relative to the 1D Mark II it replaced.

The sound of a mirror and shutter working at ten frames a second is noticeable. It was pushing the limits for the DSLR at the time and wasn't appreciably surpassed until the 14FPS EOS-1D X of 2011.

DSLR Pics: Neighborhood people with the Canon EOS-1D Mark III

The main reason I walk around with the EF 70-200mm f/4L IS on my EOS-1D Mark III is that, with an effective focal length bump to 260mm from the APS-H sensor, it's a decent lens for neighborhood squirrels and birds.

It wasn't until recently that I thought "Y'know, if the 24-105/4L IS can be pressed into service as an improvised portrait lens, why not the 70-200/4L IS? They have the same maximum aperture and they're both stabilized..."

So when I walked into Fat Dan's for lunch the other day, I bumped the ISO on the 1D3 up to 1600 and asked some folks if I could take their portraits.

I think it worked out okay, actually. There's a little bit of noise at ISO 1600 from the old 10MP sensor, but when you're shooting monochrome, that's no biggie.

DSLR Pics: Neighborhood people with the Canon EOS-1D Mark IV

Although it's not marketed that way, Canon's EF 24-105mm f/4L IS zoom lens is not terrible for portraits.

Especially on the older pro bodies with the APS-H sensors, the 1.3X crop factor means your effective focal length range of 31-136mm encloses the trinity of standard portrait focal lengths: 85mm, 105mm, and 135mm. (Here's me lamenting again that Canon abandoned the APS-H sensor size with the launch of the EOS-1D X.)

While f/4 isn't a screamingly fast aperture, it's big enough to get a reasonable amount of subject separation from the background. You're not going to blow the surroundings out in a creamy blur of bokeh, but at the same time you won't be worrying as much about not having enough depth of field to get both eyes in focus, either, so there's that.

DSLR Pics: Local wildlife with the Canon EOS-1D Mark III

The 1.3x crop factor of the APS-H sensor in the 1D Mk III turns my EF 70-200mm f/4L IS lens into an effective 91-260mm telephoto zoom. It's not super-long, but it's reasonably effective for urban wildlife.

If the weather were only slightly more clement, I'd have put it on the 7D for an even bigger focal length bump. It was quite frigid out, though, despite the unusually sunny winter skies.

Icy Road Truckin'

The weather here in Broad Ripple was bitter cold yesterday. There was only a dusting of snow on the ground, but the air temperature was in the mid-teens and not looking to get any warmer when I snapped this photo on the way to lunch.

Canon EOS-1D Mark IV & EF 24-105mm f/4L IS

Canon rates the EOS-1D Mark IV to function from 32°F to 113°F, but this is conservative and likely has a hefty bit of ass-covering safety margin built in.

The single-digit pro bodies from Canon and Nikon are expected to function in the harshest environments where photos must be taken. National Geographic photographers in the Himalayas and Sports Illustrated shooters on the sidelines of January NFL playoff games can't just go "Well, it's cold. Guess I won't take any pictures today."

Are there cameras I won't expose to this kind of weather? Sure. The lenses of the Nikon 1 series of mirrorless cameras, for example, have very fragile aperture diaphragms. Since they're essentially unrepairable at this point, I certainly don't expose them to sub-freezing temperatures, lest I brick them.

I'm wary of exposing older point & shoot cameras that I use for fun to extreme temps as well. I may not have a lot of money sunk in them, but why take chances?

I have several old vintage professional bodies: the Nikon D1X, D2X, and D3, the Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II, 1D Mark III, and 1D Mark IV, as well as the Olympus E3 and E5, all of which are the rugged, photojournalist-grade bodies from their respective manufacturers. I know it's silly to anthropomorphize gear, but I like to think that they relish getting out in awful weather because it reminds them of their working days.

.

No Training Wheels

Out on the web doing some research on the Canon EOS-1D Mark III for a future review here, I came across this excellent blog post written by a guy who'd acquired one in 2017 and was doing a sort of 10th anniversary retrospective review on it.

I did find one observation of his to be interesting, though:

"Bulk aside, the most peculiar aspect of shooting with it was the lack of auto ISO. I typically shoot aperture priority, with auto ISO enabled, and use exposure compensation to bias the exposure whichever way I need it to go.

On the 1D Mark III, ISO can only be automated by a system called Safety Shift, which works about the same but doesn’t allow you to specify a minimum shutter speed or a range or anything like that. Makes me appreciate how far we’ve come with technology, and how skilled photographers had to be before all the contemporary conveniences."

This betrays a little bit of a misunderstanding regarding the nature of the pro bodies from Canon and Nikon.

It's not that Canon lacked the technology for auto ISO in 2007 when the 1D Mark III came out. After all, my 40D of the same vintage has auto ISO, as does my old 20D which I've handed down to my roommate.

On the other hand, none of my pro bodies (Canon 1Ds Mk II, 1D Mk III, and 1D Mk IV, as well as Nikon D1X, D2X, and D3) have an auto setting for ISO sensitivity. In much the same way, they don't have the range of presets like "sports", "landscape", et cetera, or the fully automated mode represented by a green rectangle on the mode dial of a Canon or "AUTO" on a Nikon's dial.

The target market for these cameras was assumed to be working pros who wouldn't need or use those settings, and so they're just left off.

Scooterin' Santa snapped with an EOS-1D Mark III

Vintage DSLR Pics: Motorcycle Action with the Canon EOS-1D Mark IV

The EOS-1D Mark IV, launched in autumn of 2009, was Canon's last pro DSLR to use the APS-H size sensor. This sensor was slightly smaller than a full-frame 35mm negative, giving a 1.3X crop factor, and was intended to offer higher frame rates for sports shooting.

The early Canon pro bodies came in pairs. The original EOS-1D had a 4MP APS-H sensor and could shoot at 8 frames a second until the buffer filled, while the EOS-1Ds had an 11MP sensor the same size as a 35mm negative, but could only manage about 3fps and filled the buffer much faster with its enormous image files.

So the larger sensor cameras were marketed for studio and landscape work while the higher frame rate APS-H bodies were aimed at photojournalists as well as wildlife and sports photogs. The 1D Mark IV, for instance, started shipping a couple months before the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver and the timing was not a coincidence.

While the 1D Mark IV was the apex predator of the Canon lineup when it was new, sporting a $5000 price tag to match, used ones these days are obviously much cheaper, available for as little as $400 from KEH. The samples to look for, though, are the extremely good condition ones with low shutter counts. 

A friend calls those "Doctor Cameras", referring to the well-heeled enthusiast photographers who buy the top-of-the-line pro gear, designed and engineered to give years of hard use and hundreds of thousands of shutter actuations, and then use it very little before flitting off to the next Ultimate Camera. Those buyers are a boon to us Poors who like to play with high end gear, as they inevitably clean out their camera closets every few years and sell the stuff to resellers like Roberts, MPB, or the aforementioned KEH.

It's kind of ironic to use a high-speed sports camera to take pictures of motorcycles from my usual perch at 54th & College in SoBro. It's not really a spot for action photography, being a flat four-way intersection in the middle of a city...but sometimes I get lucky!

These were all shot with the 1D Mark IV and Canon's EF 24-105mm f/4L IS lens.